Book review: Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand
Writing a review of Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand turned out to be more difficult that I would have thought. This is my third draft. How do you review one of the longest novels ever written, which also happens to be cited as second only to the Bible in lists of books that changed people’s lives? I am going to take the easy way out and start with the nitpicks:
- The breakup of James and Cherryl Taggart’s marriage devolved into immature and unrealistic circumstances.
- Dagny Taggart is portayed as a strong character who takes charge of running a railroad company when no one else believes it can be done. But when she arrives in Atlantis, her attitude turns into that of a little girl which reminded me of Dorothy in The Wizard of Oz.
- John Galt’s speech is like the Energizer Bunny. It keeps going and going. Anyone listening to the three hour radio address would have turned off the radio after 10 minutes.
Those three things are it for the nitpicks, which for a book that is over 1,000 pages long means that the rest of it is pretty good.
While Atlas Shrugged is a work of fiction, the point of the novel is to explore the themes of the author’s philosophy of Objectivism. Ever since I first learned of Ayn Rand and objectivism, I had wanted to read Atlas Shrugged. But in the 20 years between learning what objectivism is and the time I finally got around to reading Atlas Shrugged, the book could not possibly change my life simply because my life had already been changed to what the effect of the book would have been. I have believed in objectivism for 20 years, so reading a novel about it could not possibly change my life.
Even though the novel was published in 1957, it is extremely relevant to today’s current political climate. I read Atlas Shrugged in September 2008. In the novel, I was reading fictionalized accounts of the government nationalizing the railroad industry and gaining more and more control over the economy. In the newspapers, I was reading about the government nationalizing institutions such as Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and AIG and using Wall Street company collapses as an excuse to gain more and more control over the economy. The warnings of the consequences of the growth and abuses of government powers that people have stated for as long as man has been ruled continue to hold truth today. Atlas Shrugged presents a realistic example of how a nation founded on the principles of freedom and democracy can lead itself into socialism and what the consequences of those actions are.
Rating: 9 out of 10.
Christine replied:
My favorite book of all time!
October 14, 2008 10:26 pm at 10:26 pm. Permalink.
Richard replied:
Gosh, 20 yrs of thinking you knew the main ideas of Ayn Rand, before having read “Atlas Shrugged”. Well, you are doing extremely well, but it is not your job to re-invent the wheel —so to speak.
Read Rand’s non-fiction. Pick your way about her periodicals: “The Objectivist”, “The Ayn Rand Letter”, and the “Objectivist Newsletter”. Or, perhaps, read her collections, particularly, “The Virtue of Selfishness”, “Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal” and “For The New Intellectual” ——but read her four Fiction books first.
Having done all that, study “Objectivism: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand”, by Leonard Peikoff. BUT, at the appropriate point, where Peikoff says, “An Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology” (OPAR) explains her ideas on concept formation so clearly that he saw no value in repeating it, read that booklet. Furthermore, use Gary Hull’s “Study Guide to OPAR” as you read. I read OPAR first, then I began again using the Study Guide, and I treated it as if I was writing an assigned set of questions from a University Professor. That is, I wrote my answers out (in MS-Word) as if I was handing them in for marking by the professor. I went a step further than that, however. I arranged a study group of six. Each of us answered the questions, then one would read aloud his response to the Study Guide Question that was his turn. Then the other five would critique his answer. That way we learned of our own mistakes, and had a better chance of seeing the profundity of the ideas Peikoff had explained.
You clearly are intellectually good, so keep pursuing the ideas. Why reinvent the wheel? You will be amazed, and utterly glad you did, should you put on your thinking cap (you obviously have one) and work as I have described above. Sure it is a big job, but it will be one of the best tasks you have ever undertaken.
October 14, 2008 10:43 pm at 10:43 pm. Permalink.